In February of 2012, Disney was finalizing a deal to purchase the rights to the Blacklisted script, Saving Mr. Banks. Both Tom Hanks and Meryl were rumored as being eyed to star as Walt Disney and P.L. Travers. I posted about it at the time of course, which happened to be about a week before Meryl was officially confirmed to star in August: Osage County. Both films were ultimately filmed around the same time later that year. This was likely what prevented Streep from participating in Banks, as it's been reported that Emma Thompson was hired after the studio was "unable to secure" Streep.
Knowing how long of a process it had been to get Banks to the screen, had it been ready six months earlier, it's reasonable to expect that it could've been released in late 2012, a year earlier than its original release. Similar to The Last Station, I had written up Saving Mr. Banks in my Shoulda Coulda Wouldas tag as a film I wanted to include in my Reimagined Filmography of Streep's screen career. With this new project, however, I get to move Banks to a parallel filmography that doesn't overextend what would've been a very tight shooting schedule.
The film depicts the story of P.L. Travers, the author of Mary Poppins, and the tedious process Walt Disney undertook to secure the film rights to the story in 1961. Travers is against almost all of the creative team's plans and suggestions--loathing songs, the idea of animation, and basically anything that doesn't seem to fit the literal depictions of what she's created in her books. We come to learn that the story of Mary Poppins is a deeply personal one for Travers, particularly with the relationship shown between the children and the seemingly uninvolved father. Multiple flashbacks show a young Travers in Australia, where she idolizes her alcoholic father (played by Coin Farrell), and is devastated when he succumbs to tuberculosis.
I do believe both Meryl and Amy got nominated because they were in more complicated and difficult roles than Emma. Both are very flamboyant.
ReplyDeleteI too find it laughable, Meryl was terrific in August: Osage County. Thompson didn't impress me thst much.
ReplyDeleteAlso hate the unfounded lies that Meryl speaking out about Walt Disney some how harmed Thompson's chances.
OMG I totally forgot to mention the "gender bigot" controversy! Meryl was right, though. And if it hurt Thompson's chances, 1) it was not Meryl's intention, and 2) people are dumb.
DeleteMy ideal movies for 2013 is either "Philomena" or "Blue Jasmine". Both are well made movies offering interesting, complex roles and I don't think Meryl being in her early 60s would have hampered either plot. I can't choose!
ReplyDeleteBoth great selections and films/characters I enjoy.
DeleteThis film had so much potential and was so talked up for years, but it was a bit 'meh' in the end I felt. A series of shots of a formerly tough-fronted woman tearing-up in a darkened cinema does not the emotional arc make.
ReplyDeleteStreep clearly tested the waters with the role, perhaps even suggested rewrites, then dropped it like a stone when 'Osage County' came along. Another example of how the 'Evita' fiasco permanently altered her approach to selecting roles.
She just danced ahead of the corporate machine and came out on top at Oscar time!